Gobierno y filosofía administrativa. Un modelo para el ejercicio de la jefatura
This work presents a model for the exercise of shipchiefness understood as a pivotal human condition that, through the impartial action of chiefs, promotes the self government of individuals and social-political settings. The development of the model has been guided by the following objectives: 1) T...
Shranjeno v:
| Izdano: |
2016
|
|---|---|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | http://hdl.handle.net/10872/13346 |
| Oznake: |
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
| Izvleček: | This work presents a model for the exercise of shipchiefness understood as a pivotal human condition that, through the impartial action of chiefs, promotes the self government of individuals and social-political settings. The development of the model has been guided by the following objectives: 1) To understand the implicit conception of shipchiefness in essential postures of political thought. 2) To deconstruct the fundamental propositions regarding the exercise of shipchiefness in founder authors of administration, 3) To derive elements that conform the model of shipchiefness from experiences in public organizations. The study has been supported by hermeneutics, phenomenology, contextualism and critical theory. These epistemologies that reveal in the political thought four different perspectives for conceiving shipchiefness, according to Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli and The Federalist: chiefs appear as coaches, leaders, strategists or executives depending on the roles that they play when they promote other people, assume collective responsability, exercise the intelligence of power by astuteness or orientate cooperative execution. This model of political shipchiefness is insufficient for conforming the no-arbitrary set of rules regarding: 1) the essential competencies of governmental performance, 2) the conformation of collective order that is derived from the reflexive aspects (components and principles of action) as well as the transitive ones (regulations and strategies), 3) the constitutive elements of sustainability of the collective order throughout time, 4) the permanence of a organized dynamic, according to the foundations that orientate and take root the perceptions and actions of chiefs to promote, not only stability, but also change. We turn to the administrative philosophies of Henri Fayol y Frederick Taylor to discover those rules of shipchiefness following its path by the propositions of Elton Mayo, Chester Barnard and Herbert Simon. We also specify four cases of experiences in public organizations that have allowed the identification of some components of those rules. Thus, it is constituted a model of shipchiefness that may be exercised by whoever is interested in becoming or developing as a chief. This model has been derived from an effort of integration and synthesis of perceptions and contributions of numerous officials, employees, workers, managers, directors, businessmen and public and private entrepreneurs. However, in spite of the constitutive effort it is, in the final analysis, through the guide of the administrative philosophies that we can disclose how the exercise of a genuine government ought to transcend the conception and practice of a managerial shipchiefness, towards another foundation that promotes an emancipatory exercise of the creativity, talents and individuals/collective capabilities. |
|---|